IBAT logo

🇲🇿 Mozambique

This IBAT Country Profile delivers nationally relevant data that are disaggregated from global datasets, to support conservation planning and reporting. It presents information on species from The IUCN Red List of Threatened Speciesâ„¢, Protected Areas and Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures (OECMs) from the World Database on Protected and Conserved Areas (WDPCA) and on Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) from the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas (WDKBA). More information on these datasets can be found below. IBAT Country Profiles are designed to build understanding of information about Protected Areas, OECMs, important sites and species present, to aid national decision-making. More specifically, this tool presents a synthesis of a vast repository of knowledge to understand issues such as extinction risk and threats to assessed species, the coverage and designation of Protected Areas and OECMs, and the location of KBAs and the degree to which they are covered by Protected Areas and OECMs.

This information can support the revision of a National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP), including, for example the development of targets and indicators. It is also highly pertinent for implementation, monitoring and reporting. In addition, it presents the opportunity to harmonise data used by government, business and other relevant stakeholders when conducting spatial planning exercises. The country profiles are updated at the end of each year using the latest versions of the WDPCA, WDKBA, and IUCN Red List. Some of the indicators presented are also included in UN SDG Indicator Database, which is updated mid-way through the year, hence there may be periodic mismatches between the data on the two platforms owing to asynchrony in update cycles.

BirdLife International, IUCN, and UNEP-WCMC are the data providers of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 14 and 15 indicators: 14.5.1: Coverage of protected areas in relation to marine areas, 15.1.2 Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%), 15.1.2 Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%), 15.4.1 Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity, and 15.5.1 Red List Index. These indicators are all included here and are highlighted with their relevant SDG icon. Please click on the icons for further information.

Disclaimer: The statistics and indicators presented on protected areas, OECMs, KBAs and species may differ from those reported nationally by countries owing to differences in methods, data and/or metrics. National metrics may be more appropriate for some purposes, but do not allow comparison between countries or regions or with global statistics if they are not standardised. The metrics presented for each nation on the IBAT Country Profiles are consistent and standardised in terms of input data, methods and presentation, allowing such comparisons.

3 Information about Key Biodiversity Areas

3.1 Overview

Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are sites that contribute significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity in terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. They are identified through national processes by local stakeholders using a set of globally agreed scientific criteria.

See Table 7 for the number of KBAs in this country.

KBAs are useful for setting national priorities for establishing or expanding protected areas and ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’ (such as community-managed areas), for identifying priorities for conservation interventions, and for informing the implementation of site-safeguard policies. The typically bottom-up process by which they are identified recognises that most conservation action takes place at the local and national level.

The data presented below are drawn from the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas, which is managed by BirdLife International on behalf of the KBA Partnership.

As with all datasets there is important information about its origin and character that should inform its appropriate use. Please see Appendix 1 for important information about these data.

*BirdLife International is a Global Partnership of more than a 100 national independent conservation NGOs – BirdLife Partners – that work together in a collaborative, coordinated fashion.

Table 7. Number of KBAs

Note: The total number of KBAs does not always equate to the sum of columns (Terrestrial, marine, Freshwater and Mountain). This is because some areas are identified as a KBA under more than one classification (for example: a coastal site may also be classified under both terrestrial and marine biomes). Sites that cover more than one biome are not counted twice in the total number.

KBA Type Terrestrial Marine Freshwater Mountain Total
IBA 13 7 3 2 13
AZE 10 7 0 6 10
All KBAs 32 17 7 9 36

Note that some KBAs qualify as both IBAs and AZEs. For further information please see the sources below:

3.2 Protected Area coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas

The graphs in Figure 5, Figure 6 and Table 8 display the degree to which KBAs are covered by Protected Areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs). These data are presented to illustrate the status and gaps in protection of important sites for biodiversity, and to inform prioritization of the establishment or expansion of Protected Areas, OECMs or other biodiversity management approaches.

Figure 4. Map showing the overlap between Key Biodiversity Areas, Protected Areas and OECMs.

Figure 5. Protected Area and OECM coverage of all KBAs (N=36), IBAs (N=13) and AZEs (N=10). Complete (> 98% coverage) = dark green, Partial = bright green, None (< 2%) = light green, Not assessed = grey.

3.3 Trends over time in Protected Area and OECM coverage of all KBAs

The table and graph below show trends in the mean percentage of each KBA that is covered by Protected Areas and OECMs, based on data on the date of establishment of Protected Areas and OECMs in the World Database on Protected and Conserved Areas, and spatial overlaps between digital polygons for Protected Areas, OECMs and KBAs. For full details, see https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-15-01-02.pdf, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-15-04-01.pdf, and https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-14-05-01.pdf

Figure 6. Trends in coverage of all KBAs by Protected Areas and OECMs. Grey shading shows 95% confidence intervals where relevant.

Table 8. Mean percentage coverage of KBAs by Protected Areas and OECMs.

Year Protected Areas and OECMs Protected Areas OECMs
1980 16.53% 15.39% 0.00%
1990 16.53% 15.39% 0.00%
2000 19.61% 18.35% 0.00%
2010 35.59% 35.56% 0.00%
2020 41.07% 41.07% 0.00%
2021 41.07% 41.07% 0.00%
2022 41.07% 41.07% 0.00%
2023 41.07% 41.07% 0.00%
2024 41.07% 41.07% 0.00%
2025 41.07% 41.07% 0.00%

3.4 Monitoring the conservation status of IBAs

At present, information on the conservation status of KBAs derived from systematic monitoring is available only for the subset of KBAs that are IBAs.

The pressures on IBAs (threats), their state (condition) and the responses in place (conservation actions) are each scored on a 4-point scale using a standardised monitoring protocol (https://datazone.birdlife.org/info/ibamonitoring) by BirdLife Partners, to provide a simple assessment of the conservation status of each site. Where available, data from the most recent assessments are summarised below. These indicators should facilitate assessment of the effectiveness of measures taken to address biodiversity loss.

Figure 7a. Pressure on IBAs: percentage of sites assessed in the country with different levels of threats to populations of the species for which each site qualifies as an IBA (n=6)

This chart is not currently available for this country

Figure 7b. State of IBAs: percentage of sites assessed in the country with different scores for the condition of populations of the species for which each site qualifies as an IBA (n=6)

This chart is not currently available for this country

Figure 7c. Responses for IBAs - percentage of sites assessed in the country with different scores for the adequacy of conservation actions to benefit populations of the species for which each site qualifies as an IBA (n=6)

This chart is not currently available for this country

* The 'Pressure - State - Response' framework has been recognised by the CBD Decision VII/8 as a guidance to assess national level implementation.

Want to learn more?

The designations employed and the presentation of material on the maps in this profile do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IBAT Partners concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.

The data presented are curated by IBAT Partners: BirdLife International, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). These partners have developed in-depth knowledge about the value, limitations and appropriate use of these data, which can provide users with confidence when applying them in a decision-making context. Where particular data fields are missing for a particular country, please contact IBAT to discuss how we may be able to assist.